Patent Research

An unfiled invention loses value the moment it becomes public. Prior art searching with a model puts a description of that invention into a request. Claim language and patentability opinions carry a second risk, because a fluent answer can read as a legal conclusion.

Patent teams reach for this starter when prior art searches and claim summaries already use a model. A matter number or docket number in the prompt is masked first. Blocked wording covers privileged and confidential, sealed filing, and settlement amount. An invention disclosure marked with those words is refused rather than trimmed.

Prior art needs care. The citation check compares references against the context you provide, and by default it flags a weak reference instead of stopping the answer. A flagged citation still returns to the researcher, so confirmation of every reference remains manual work.

The practice screen stops output that tells a reader to file this lawsuit or sign this settlement. A privilege screen sits in the chain with nothing configured in it. Scoring demands 0.90 combined, and it weighs relevance and accuracy equally at 0.78 and 0.80. Very short answers fail, since the gate wants 120 characters and two sentences.

Patentability, filing strategy and the duty of disclosure stay with a qualified attorney or agent. History capture records metadata about each call and not the text of an invention description. The oversight step waits for configuration, so no reviewer is notified yet. Confidentiality duties for unfiled inventions remain a contractual and procedural matter for the firm.