Justice System

Court records carry material that was sealed for a reason. A clerk summarizing a file, or a judge reading a risk memo, can move that material without meaning to. Judicial staff get research help under limits that stay strict. No output here decides bail, sentence or liberty.

Handling that material is the first job in the chain. Sealed matter redaction runs before general masking and covers sealed, juvenile and grand jury content. A second pass masks case and docket numbers, victim names, witness identities, juror lists and sealed record references. Sealed cases, in camera and ex parte material and witness protection references are blocked outright. Sentence recommendations, bail amounts, plea offers and probation terms are blocked in the same pass.

The bias watch on the response has one trigger only. It needs hiring, promotion or performance review wording in the request, which a docket or sentencing question never carries. Read it as a monitoring hook, because it settles no fairness question in judicial work. Term rules also block prompts about threatening a witness, intimidating a juror, obstructing justice or tampering with evidence.

Citation checks require sources at 0.92 confidence, because a fabricated authority in a judicial memo is a serious event. The scoring floors are a combined 0.85, accuracy of 0.92 and relevance of 0.86. An answer that misses a floor is blocked rather than delivered.

The workflow does not open at all without a user, an organization and a judicial role. Redacted history capture is enabled for later review. An audit marker records the evaluation and stops no answer. No configuration here makes an output admissible, and none of it substitutes for judicial reasoning.