Product comparison
Verdictan vs. NeuralTrust TrustGate: comparison
A regulated team that needs enforceable controls across agents, models and tools.
Why Verdictan
Verdictan applies policy at the gateway and records request-level decision evidence for supported AI traffic. Run it in a self-hosted or air-gapped environment.
Key differences
Verdictan vs. NeuralTrust TrustGate: Key differences
A gateway can claim broad security while packaging core enforcement, audit and deployment features in different tiers.
TrustGate spans LLM, MCP and A2A
NeuralTrust positions separate gateway paths for models, tools and agent-to-agent handoffs.
Open core plus enterprise topologies
The product page documents open-source self-hosting and SaaS, hybrid, on-premises or air-gapped enterprise options.
A route-level security engine
NeuralTrust describes TrustGuard as an attachable security engine that inspects traffic inline and adds findings to traces.
Side by side
Feature comparison
Scroll horizontally to review all comparison columns.
| Feature | Verdictan | NeuralTrust TrustGate |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture and deployment | ||
| Model request gateway | Documented | Documented |
| Open-source core | Documented | Documented |
| SaaS, hybrid and air-gapped deployment | Documented | Documented |
| Model traffic | Limited: Two request families | Documented |
| MCP traffic | Documented | Documented |
| A2A traffic | Not documented in the reviewed sources | Documented |
| Security, routing and evidence | ||
| Per-agent and per-tool RBAC | Not documented in the reviewed sources | Documented |
| Provider routing | Documented | Documented |
| Inline request inspection | Documented | Documented |
| PII and data controls | Documented | Documented |
| Caching and cost | Documented | Documented |
| Cryptographic audit trails | Not documented in the reviewed sources | Documented |
Common questions
What to ask before you decide
Is NeuralTrust TrustGate open source?
NeuralTrust describes the gateway core as Apache 2.0 and links to its public repository.
Can TrustGate run air-gapped?
The product page lists an on-premises or air-gapped Kubernetes option with no external calls.
Does TrustGate cover MCP and A2A?
NeuralTrust documents dedicated paths for MCP tool access and agent-to-agent handoffs.
Is every NeuralTrust security feature in the open gateway?
Do not assume that. NeuralTrust describes TrustGuard as an attachable security engine. Confirm open-core and enterprise packaging.
How should performance claims be handled?
Treat published latency, throughput and detection figures as vendor claims until your team reproduces them with representative traffic.
What should the trial test?
Test multi-turn attacks, PII handling, provider failover, MCP permissions, A2A traces and independent audit verification.
How we researched this page
We checked the official sources below on Aug. 11, 2026. Product scope, plan access, beta status and support can change.
- Confirm which TrustGate, TrustGuard and enterprise features are included in the proposed edition.
- Treat vendor performance and detection figures as claims until they are independently reproduced.
- Verify cryptographic audit export, retention and validation with your own compliance process.
- 1. Verdictan: Verdictan | AI Governance Gateway
- 2. Verdictan: Verdictan Docs
- 3. Verdictan: Runtime Request Families
- 4. Verdictan: verdictan gateway run
- 5. Verdictan: API Token Management
- 6. Verdictan: Usage Costs and Budgets
- 7. Verdictan: Govern AI Agents from the CLI
- 8. NeuralTrust: AI Gateway for Enterprise — TrustGate
- 9. NeuralTrust: TrustGate source repository
- 10. NeuralTrust: NeuralTrust vs. TrueFoundry: AI Gateway Comparison 2026Updated July 16, 2026
Verdictan is not affiliated with NeuralTrust. Product names can be trademarks of their respective owners.
Put the comparison to work
Try Verdictan against the same security cases.
The team deploys a gateway whose security decisions and audit trail survive technical review.